Money will only add to this fact. As always, there are two sides to any argument. These players have to manage their time between performing well academically, attending practices daily, and being ready to play games each week.
Giving them what they deserve right? The money is put back into the school, which aids in advancing the campus, lowering tuition, and improving the school overall. A huge majority of professional sports players go completely broke within years of their retirement.
Attract Talent Schools that would be willing to pay for their athletes to play for them would attracted better, and more talented athletes to their school. Receiving an income can cause college athletes to think that sports is important than education. Even as a former college athlete, I am at a point in my life where I can understand each side.
List of Pros of Paying College Athletes 1. Currently, the NCAA is providing limited compensation for athletes, while participant schools are receiving the bulk of the money earned from these athletic events. By paying these players, they are receiving double the benefits of normal students on scholarships for things such as academics.
This includes endorsements and incentives. Physical sports, like basketball and football, are not for the weak. Generates income If all college athletes decide not to play until they get paid, schools and the NCAA might as well kiss the business goodbye.
Should they receive more because they were All-Americans? List of Cons of Paying College Athletes 1. If they had to begin paying players, other programs would likely suffer as a result. But I do find it interesting as to why so many are widely opposed to this idea.
Along with exposure, they are also given a major amount of grants and scholarships for their education. Sports scholarships pay for the majority of players to attend the school and play sports. Should they receive more because they were All-Americans?
This could put the school in a bad spot financially, as well as single out players who do not perform as well as others by paying them less. Giving them what they deserve right? This leaves one big question here, what about the players? As a result, they might focus more on practicing with their team instead of going to classes, doing their term papers, and studying for exams.
College sports teams have life long followers, not just ones that are in college.
They will lose that hunger and passion that we see in college. It will be traded for lackadaisical plays and half-ass efforts that we sometimes see from pros.
InShabazz Napier was quoted: Over the years we have seen and heard scandals involving players taking money and even point-shaving. It gives student athletes a much-needed income. Stop Corruption These college athletes are often drawn into corruption by boosters and agents that are willing to bribe them to play for their school.
Players of Northwestern Wildcats are considered primarily as athletes rather than students. This is an unfair way to treat these college students.
It will be traded for lackadaisical plays and half-ass efforts that we sometime see from pros. Provides a source of funds After academic responsibilities, most college athletes spend their time practicing, which leaves little room for finding other means of making money to compensate for food, board, books and other expenses not covered by their scholarship grants.College athletes work hard.
They also often get financial help for tuition. So should college athletes be paid? The pros and cons of treating college. College Athletes Getting Paid? Here Are Some Pros And Cons part in the reason why many people oppose the fact that college athletes should be getting paid.
According to the same article, “A. This is a problem within the college sports community that is likely to be eliminated if college athletes were paid.
6. Its profits would be evenly distributed throughout the school’s needs. List of Cons of Paying College Athletes. 1. It might put a student’s education at the back seat.
20 Principal Pros and Cons of Affirmative Action. Should college athletes be paid? Let’s take a quick glance at the pros and cons of each perspective. By the way, there’s a part two to this Should College Athletes be Paid series. For starters, in my opinion, yes, college athletes should get paid.
What deserves debate, is the [ ]. 8 Prevailing Pros and Cons of The Dream Act. 7 Most Notable Pros and Cons of Paying College Athletes. November 10, Crystal Lombardo Pros and Cons. The issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid has been one that comes up over and over, but is never truly solved.
Let’s look at the effects that paying collegiate athletes. Should College Athletes Get Paid? Here Are The Pros And Cons Race isn’t the only issue, but statistically, it plays a huge part in the reason why many people oppose the fact that college athletes should be getting paid. According to the same article, “A majority ― 52% ― of black respondents are strongly or somewhat in favor of.Download